Mike De Palmer vs Paul Mcnamee Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. De Palmer vs P. Mcnamee

Mike De Palmer

USA

3

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

3

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Palmer 3 - 3 Mcnamee

They have played 13 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 7 and Paul Mcnamee winning 6. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Paul Mcnamee was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Palmer	3
Mcnamee	3

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Wembley(11-10-86)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Paul Mcnamee

(R4) Queens Club(06-10-85)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Mike De Palmer

(R4) Sydney Indoor(10-08-84)

Stats

Mike De Palmer

Paul Mcnamee

M. D. Palmer vs P. Mcnamee H2H Profile

M. D. Palmer	Stats	P. Mcnamee
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.55% (81-93)	Career Total W/L	52.74% (260-233)
0	Grass	2
1	Hard	0
2	Indoor	1
0	Titles	4
3	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. D. Palmer vs P. Mcnamee Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mike De Palmer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mike De Palmer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mike De Palmer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mike De Palmer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul Mcnamee winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mike De Palmer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 15/ 19). Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/ 39).
Player level: In the last year, Mike De Palmer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Mike De Palmer winning 3 times and Paul Mcnamee being victorious 3 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Mike De Palmer winning 7 and Paul Mcnamee winning 6. The last match between Mike De Palmer and Paul Mcnamee was at the Wembley, 10-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Mike De Palmer getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mike De Palmer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Paul Mcnamee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mike De Palmer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul Mcnamee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mike De Palmer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mike De Palmer vs Paul Mcnamee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. D. Palmer vs P. Mcnamee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. D. Palmer	Stats	P. Mcnamee
3	H2H Matches Won	3
7	Sets Won	6
71	Games Won	64
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
50% (3/6)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (3/6)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won → Match Won	100% (3/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

M. D. Palmer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Johannesburg CH - 01-05-1989
R4 Peter PalandjianP. Palandjian	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
R3 Stefan Van SchalkwykS. Van	W	2-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 12-09-1988
R3 Gary DonnellyG. Donnelly	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
R4 Scott DavisS. Davis	L	5-7 6-4 7-6	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 18-07-1988
R3 David NainkinD. Nainkin	L	0-6 7-5 6-2	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

M. D. Palmer vs P. Mcnamee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. D. Palmer	Stats	P. Mcnamee
46.55% (81/93)	YTD Win/Loss	52.74% (260/233)
47.79% (227/248)	Sets Win/Loss	51.88% (662/614)
48.69% (2283/2406)	Games Win/Loss	50.55% (6201/6067)
45.24% (38/46)	Hard Win/Loss	47.30% (35/39)
46.43% (13/15)	Clay Win/Loss	53.16% (126/111)
53.57% (15/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	51.43% (36/34)
44.12% (15/19)	Grass Win/Loss	56.25% (63/49)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
488.78	Average Opponent Rank	527.71
40.00% (12/18)	Slam W/L	53.57% (45/39)
33.33% (4/8)	Masters W/L	48.00% (12/13)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	64.71% (11/6)
50.42% (60/59)	Main Tour W/L	50.57% (178/174)
38.46% (5/8)	Challenger W/L	93.33% (14/1)
48% (67/140)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (204/387)
41% (14/34)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	54% (55/102)
49% (33/68)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (74/143)
73% (84/61)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (258/221)
27% (84/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (258/36)
22% (90/20)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (234/40)